EDOC Web Tables

Input

Table 1: Interventions With Promise

Intervention or strategy

Description

Enhanced access to nonemergent care outside of the ED Enhanced access to external specialists, imaging and other diagnostic interventions, home care, primary care, postoperative follow-up, and long-term care, including access outside of regular business hours.
Surge management and prediction Planning and tools to apply real-time protocols to address uncertainty in demand for ED services and help ensure appropriate resource levels and manage surges before they occur.
Matching staffing to patient arrival Analyzing patient arrival patterns (e.g., by day, week, or seasonal), and matching staffing capacity and skill mix to these patterns.
Remote triage Triage from a distance, including telephone, video, web, or SMS.
Paramedic practitioner service Paramedic practitioners receive additional training (e.g., palliative care, gerontology) to “assess and treat” or to refer older adults with a range of conditions as part of prehospital care.
EMS prehospital decision-making Prehospital decision-making by first responders with training in and access to prehospital decision systems and associated decision support tools.
Ambulance offload strategies Dedicated staff and space for ambulance offload, including offload to chairs.
Ambulance diversion strategies ED diversion protocols for ambulances transporting patients with nonemergent conditions who may be suitable for care at facilities offering subacute care (i.e., facilities providing primary care or multidisciplinary care for patients without immediate or acute care needs) rather than EDs.
Home-based care strategies Health and supportive care provided by a professional in the home, which may include support for a range of activities, such as bathing, toileting, feeding, and supporting activities of daily living. Home care providers may also monitor vital signs, carry out physician orders, and facilitate testing and monitoring of patients’ conditions.

ED = emergency department.

 

Table 2: Moderate- and High-Quality Conclusive Evidencea

Intervention

Description

Characteristics across evidenceb

Intervention effectiveness by outcomec

Paramedic practitioner service Paramedic practitioners receive additional training to assess and treat or to refer individuals to the next care provider as part of prehospital care
  • Older adults
  • Falls, hemorrhage, acute medical conditions
  • ED-related wait times: favourable
  • ED visits: favourable
  • Patient satisfaction: favourable
EMS prehospital decision-making Ambulance personnel have training in and access to the prehospital decision system and decision support tools to triage eligible individuals to alternative health care
  • Older adults
  • ED visits: favourable
Remote triage Remote triage from a distance (e.g., telephone, video, web, text message) for initial assessment and management of acute, unscheduled, or undifferentiated care
  • Adults
  • Respiratory conditions
  • ED visits: neutral

ED = emergency department; EMS = emergency medical services.
a Interventions with certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty (moderate or high certainty) that is moderate or high quality based on AMSTAR 2 ratings.
b Population and setting characteristics of the individual studies that contributed to the evidence. 
c The outcome measured in the evidence with its effectiveness across the evidence. Favourable: certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty of better effectiveness of the intervention versus a comparator. Neutral: certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty (moderate or high certainty) that neither the intervention nor the comparator was favoured.

Table 3: New and Emerging Interventions

Intervention

Description

Implemented where?

Mobile integrated health response teams leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Niagara Emergency Medical Services (Thorold, Ontario)
  • Alberta
  • Italy
Neighbourhood model leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • St. Joseph’s Home Care Neighbourhood Model for Seniors at Risk (Hamilton, Ontario)
Community support teams leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Alberta
Rapid access to diagnostic testing and IV therapy in long-term care
  • Ontario
Same-day physician access in long-term care leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Ontario
Nurse-led shared medical appointments leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Calgary, Alberta
Attract Connect Stay model leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Marathon, Ontario, and Australia
Community pharmacy primary care clinics leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Nova Scotia Health and the Pharmacy Association of Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia)
Embedded physician assistants in rural and remote primary care leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Ongomiizwin Health Services (Winnipeg, Manitoba)
Real-time virtual support for rural physicians leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia (British Columbia)
Remote monitoring and home health monitoring leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • People receive home health monitoring kit with touch screen tablet computer to measure blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and body weight, and so on. People submit daily biometric measurements and responses to questions about their symptoms which alerts a monitoring nurse who provides self-management education and advance care planning.
QR codes to increase use and distribution of discharge instructions leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Vancouver General Hospital (Vancouver, British Columbia)
Quality improvement in palliative oncology leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Odette Cancer Centre (Toronto, Ontario)
RELIEF digital health app leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Brampton Civic Hospital (Brampton, Ontario)
Used cellphone program for people experiencing houselessness leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario)
Mobile apps to reduce hospital readmissions after surgery leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • St. Joseph’s Health Care Hamilton (Hamilton, Ontario)
  • Ottawa Hospital (Ottawa, Ontario)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, Ontario)
HEARTSMAP for children and youth experiencing mental health challenges leaf indicates implemented in Canada BC Children’s Hospital (Vancouver, British Columbia)
Community hospital–based heart function clinics leaf indicates implemented in Canada Central Local Health Integration Network (Ontario)
ED return visit quality program leaf indicates implemented in Canada
 
  • Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program (Ontario)
  • Calgary
ED avoidance classification leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Hamilton, Ontario
Housing placement intervention to reduce ED readmissions
  • California, US
Surge management and prediction leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • St. Catherine’s Hospital (St. Catherine’s, Ontario)
  • The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario)
  • St. Michael’s Hospital (Toronto, Ontario)
Forecasting daily attendance at EDs
  • Lille, France
  • Finland
Clinical roles for emergency medical communications centres leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Dalhousie University (Halifax, Nova Scotia)
PriCARE patient classification for potentially preventable ED visits by ambulance transport leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Ontario
Real-time wait time reporting leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Canada
Virtual pediatric ED visits leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (Ottawa, Ontario)
  • Montreal Children’s Hospital (Montreal, Quebec)
Minor injury ED appointment bookings leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre (Barrie, Ontario)

ED = emergency department; QR = quick response.
Note: leaf indicates implemented in Canada indicates implemented in Canada.

Table 4: Inconclusive, Unfavourable, or Low-Quality Evidence

Intervention

Characteristics across evidencea

Intervention effectiveness by outcomeb

Telemedicine with electrical stethoscope and real-time videoconferencing
  • Children
  • Low and high income
  • Urban and suburban settings
  • ED visits: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
Group education sessions to assess and manage asthma
  • Children
  • Asthma
  • Urban and suburban settings
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, conclusive
General practitioner cooperative located near ED of a general hospital)
  • Children
  • Urban and suburban settings
  • ED visits: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
Interventions to help people look after minor health problems and know how to access the right services (e.g., navigation tools, written or oral education, rapid triage website)
  • Adults
  • Children
  • Remote settings
  • Urban settings
  • Influenza-like illness
  • Nonemergent conditions
  • Low income
  • Culturally and linguistically diverse
  • ED visits: low quality, favourable or mixed, inconclusive
  • Patient satisfaction: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED revisits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Home-based care (care delivered at home)
  • Adults
  • High health care needs
  • Urban settings
  • Chronic conditions
  • Depression
  • Racialized groups
  • People requiring assistance with activities of daily living  
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Telephonic models of care (delivered through telephone or mail)
  • Adults
  • High health care needs
  • Urban settings
  • Chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes; kidney, renal, vascular disease)
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Primary care models (embedded in primary care)
  • Adults
  • Older adults
  • High health care needs
  • Urban settings
  • Depression
  • Chronic conditions
  • Complex medical and behavioural conditions
  • People who access the ED or clinics frequently
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral or mixed, inconclusive
Community-based models (care coordination outside the health care system and where people are located)
  • Adults
  • High health care needs
  • Urban settings
  • People experiencing houselessness
  • People experiencing mental health and substance use challenges
  • People who access the ED frequently
  • People with more than 2 inpatient admissions 
  • People staying in psychiatric units or prisons
  • ED visits: low quality, mixed, inconclusive
  • ED psychiatric visits: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
Ambulatory intensive care units
  • Adults
  • High health care needs
  • Urban settings
  • Veterans
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Paramedic and allied health professionals providing onsite care to long-term care patients
  • Older adults living in long-term care facilities
  • Rural settings
  • ED visits: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
Interventions to reduce ED visits in children with medical complexities (e.g., ambulatory, hospital, primary care, hospital pharmacist-led)
  • Children with medical complexities (e.g., complex diseases, chronic medications)
  • ED visits: moderate quality, favourable or neutral, inconclusive
Telemedicine triage
  • Not reported
  • ED length of stay: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Telemedicine
  • Older adults
  • Asthma
  • People who access the ED frequently
  • Low income
  • Senior living communities
  • ED visits: low quality, favourable, conclusive or inconclusive
Primary care or home care-based case management, medical alerts, hospital in nursing home, onsite long-term care
  • Older adults
  • People who access the ED frequently
  • People with more than 2 hospital admissions
  • Low income
  • Falls
  • Chronic illness
  • Heart failure
  • People requiring assistance with activities of daily living  
  • Functional disability
  • ED visits: low quality, favourable or neutral, conclusive or inconclusive
  • ED revisits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
  • ED length of stay: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
Direct mailing intervention (to promote influenza vaccinations and to promote telephonic nurse advice service)
  • Older adults
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, conclusive
Health service interventions for people with dementia living in the community, to avoid hospital use
  • Older adults with neurocognitive conditions (e.g., Alzheimer disease, dementia)
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, conclusive
Paramedic decision-making interventions (e.g., triage, assessment, treatment, and referral)
  • Adults
  • Older adults
  • Falls
  • Nonemergent conditions
  • Minor injuries
  • Alcohol use
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
  • ED revisits: low quality, neutral, conclusive
Interventions to reduce nonurgent ED visits by children (e.g., educational materials, ED sessions, telephone counselling)
  • Children
  • Minor illness
  • ED revisits: moderate quality, favourable or neutral, inconclusive
Remote triage (e.g., telephone, video, web, text message)
  • Adults
  • Racialized groups
  • Patient satisfaction: moderate quality, neutral, inconclusive
Interventions led by staff with geriatrics training for nursing home residents
  • Older adults
  • People experiencing delirium
  • ED visits: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED length of stay: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
General practitioner interventions (e.g., extended opening hours, walk-in centres)
  • Adults
  • Children
  • ED visits: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED visits: low quality, mixed, inconclusive
General practitioner cooperatives or walk-in centres
  • Adults
  • Musculoskeletal and skin conditions
  • ED visits: low quality, favourable or mixed, inconclusive
  • Health practitioner workload: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Hospital-at-home interventions for older adults
  • Older adults
  • Acute illness
  • Low income
  • Racialized groups
  • ED length of stay: moderate quality, unfavourable, inconclusive
  • ED visits: moderate quality, neutral, inconclusive
Intensive primary care programs
  • Older adults
  • Urban settings
  • Racialized groups
  • Heart disease
  • Respiratory conditions
  • Cognitive conditions
  • Cerebrovascular conditions
  • Frailty
  • Chronic conditions
  • Depression
  • People living alone
  • Low income
  • Diabetes
  • People who have been hospitalized more than twice in past year
  • Psychiatric conditions
  • People requiring assistance with activities of daily living
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral or favourable, inconclusive or conclusive

ED = emergency department.
a Population and setting characteristics of the individual studies that contributed to the evidence.

b The outcome measured in the evidence with its quality based on A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2 (AMSTAR 2) ratings and the effectiveness across the evidence. Inconclusive: very uncertain evidence (has low or very low certainty). Unfavourable: unfavourable effectiveness of the intervention on outcomes versus a comparator. Low quality: systematic review has a critical flaw based on AMSTAR 2 ratings and may not provide an accurate and comprehensive summary of the available studies that address the question of interest. Moderate quality: systematic review has more than 1 weakness, but no critical flaws. High quality: systematic review provides an accurate and comprehensive summary of the results of the available studies that address the question of interest. Favourable: certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty of better effectiveness of the intervention versus a comparator. Neutral: certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty (moderate or high certainty) that neither the intervention nor the comparator was favoured. Mixed: heterogeneous results for effectiveness of an intervention versus a comparator, and the heterogeneity is too serious to draw a conclusion. Unfavourable: unfavourable effectiveness of the intervention on outcomes versus a comparator. Inconclusive: very uncertain evidence (has low or very low certainty). No evidence: there is no evidence from primary studies.